What's Up?

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:21 am

Ghost Leader wrote:

I don't know about Raine, but I personally count Survivor 1 & 2 and Dead Aim as part of the "classic" category as well.

I agree. Basically in my point of view, I consider classic everything until RE4, mainly because there is a HUGE change in the series after that game.
Just my oppinion, of course that if we are strict the first three games are the "classic" ones, and I think is ok to consider Outbreaks a "classic" Re game, mainly because it is third person

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:46 am

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

I don't know about Raine, but I personally count Survivor 1 & 2 and Dead Aim as part of the "classic" category as well.

I agree. Basically in my point of view, I consider classic everything until RE4, mainly because there is a HUGE change in the series after that game.
Just my oppinion, of course that if we are strict the first three games are the "classic" ones, and I think is ok to consider Outbreaks a "classic" Re game, mainly because it is third person

RE4 and 5 are third person too.

_________________
Leon Fanboys Please Click Here

Wesker is officially dead: http://ps3.ign.com/articles/100/1006931p1.html

NiteKrawler wrote:

Jamesy wrote:

Fine you win NightCrawler

YYYYYEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOHOOOO!!!!!! Who's up for round 2!?!?!?!?!?!?

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:33 am

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

I don't know about Raine, but I personally count Survivor 1 & 2 and Dead Aim as part of the "classic" category as well.

I agree. Basically in my point of view, I consider classic everything until RE4, mainly because there is a HUGE change in the series after that game.
Just my oppinion, of course that if we are strict the first three games are the "classic" ones, and I think is ok to consider Outbreaks a "classic" Re game, mainly because it is third person

Nope, there isnt a HUGE difference. ridiculous.

and you would consider Outbreak classic? are you joking?

the reason the first three games would be considered classic is because well, theyre the first 3. they are old, have been around for a good long while and most grew up playing them. re4 already has a huge hate following, plus coming out much later, and being overpopular.

but basically being and looking older.

outbreak is definately not a classic.

mgs is a pretty classic game.

just like with movies, the way something like Psycho, Space Odyssey and Pulp Fiction can probably all be considered classics, while The Thing remake and My Bloody Valentine not so much.

it has nothing to do with being 3rd person.

_________________
-Vae Victus-Suffering To The Conquered-
"The ultimate lifeform...Tyrant", Albert Wesker, REmake
Consumer Recreation Services

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:28 am

NiteKrawler wrote:

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

I don't know about Raine, but I personally count Survivor 1 & 2 and Dead Aim as part of the "classic" category as well.

I agree. Basically in my point of view, I consider classic everything until RE4, mainly because there is a HUGE change in the series after that game.
Just my oppinion, of course that if we are strict the first three games are the "classic" ones, and I think is ok to consider Outbreaks a "classic" Re game, mainly because it is third person

RE4 and 5 are third person too.

sorry, i was refering to the fixed camera angles

@at spikey: read the part that says "In my point of view", and about RE4, I'm not talking about the silly discussion about the survival horror, I'm talking about the gameplay, the gameplay after RE4 was never the same

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 9:09 am

I think I love you.

Ha ha. No. But I like hearing that the old games are much better than 4 or 5 and whatever else. ^_^

Welcome, and have lots of fun. ^_^

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:24 am

PAULSAMSON wrote:

NiteKrawler wrote:

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Ghost Leader wrote:

I don't know about Raine, but I personally count Survivor 1 & 2 and Dead Aim as part of the "classic" category as well.

I agree. Basically in my point of view, I consider classic everything until RE4, mainly because there is a HUGE change in the series after that game.
Just my oppinion, of course that if we are strict the first three games are the "classic" ones, and I think is ok to consider Outbreaks a "classic" Re game, mainly because it is third person

RE4 and 5 are third person too.

sorry, i was refering to the fixed camera angles

@at spikey: read the part that says "In my point of view", and about RE4, I'm not talking about the silly discussion about the survival horror, I'm talking about the gameplay, the gameplay after RE4 was never the same

Games like Outbreak, CVX, Zer0 and REmake do have the classic gameplay style but that would outline all the other RE games from the same era from being "classics". You did say you agree with GL but the Survivor series did not have the same gameplay style as the originals. Actually DA had much the same gameplay style as what it is today.

_________________
~The Weapon of Mass Distraction~

COMMUNITY:
Resident Evil Forums Chat Group: [link]
Resident Evil Forums Facebook: [link]
Come check my Let's Plays: [link]
Gaming forum I'm moderating: [link]

Subject: Re: What's Up? Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:28 pm

Mass Distraction wrote:

Actually DA had much the same gameplay style as what it is today.

Except it wasn't an action shooter (despite the back cover saying it is lol), it still maintained the horror movie atmosphere that the previous games had.

Subject: Re: What's Up? Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:17 am

Ghost Leader wrote:

Mass Distraction wrote:

Actually DA had much the same gameplay style as what it is today.

Except it wasn't an action shooter (despite the back cover saying it is lol), it still maintained the horror movie atmosphere that the previous games had.

As did RE4. By RE5, when they say those bits about the horror, nobody here probably takes that seriously, but still, RE4 maintained that atmosphere without deviating too much.

@Paul, I read the whole thing and my post still stands.

Your point of view isn't what I'm talking about. The gameplay hasn't been the same for a long time. RE4 made some adjustments to things that have been showing up for a long time.

_________________
-Vae Victus-Suffering To The Conquered-
"The ultimate lifeform...Tyrant", Albert Wesker, REmake
Consumer Recreation Services

Subject: Re: What's Up? Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:30 am

Spike991 wrote:

Your point of view isn't what I'm talking about. The gameplay hasn't been the same for a long time. RE4 made some adjustments to things that have been showing up for a long time.

In what games?

Subject: Re: What's Up? Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:37 am

PAULSAMSON wrote:

Spike991 wrote:

Your point of view isn't what I'm talking about. The gameplay hasn't been the same for a long time. RE4 made some adjustments to things that have been showing up for a long time.

In what games?

At least since RE3. And I could sit here and list all kinds of similarities and evolutions from earlier things, that were maybe perfected by RE4. Stuff like dodging.

I know i've done it before, in one of the many, many, many, many RE4 discussion I've had.

_________________
-Vae Victus-Suffering To The Conquered-
"The ultimate lifeform...Tyrant", Albert Wesker, REmake
Consumer Recreation Services