Ah nuts...curse them...yet again it will be more crap that claims to be based on RE but is really so loosely based upon it that it might as well resemble the loose, decaying skin on the local zombies....yeah lets go sabotage it...RE fans riot against unfair useage of the brand name......if only i had a real Nemesis i could send it to go get the cast and crew

Instead of yelling STARS, he'd yell ANDERSON!!!! lol

And then whip out his ginat rocket launcher and fire it...thus detroying all the sets and killing off the cast and crew...oh i am mean but hey they are ruining my fave ever fancise.

i understand not liking the movies but the way i look at it like i ve said before its just another take on the whole story .

now i really like the movies . the first one i loved , second one eh was ok , the third one i really liked cause it kinda shows what it really could be like down the road if it really happened . i know probably no one will agree with me lol but i feel that aside from the games , the movies and books are just another way to enjoy a common theme

Exactly...spot on there....if it was different characters and still a true RE base i wouldn't have minded so much but it's the fact that they took characters from the series and messed them up completely. And yes that nip slip was a complete piss take...you don't get that in the games so why in the movies....i literally cried when i saw who they had as Chris Redfield...he looked nowt like him...Hollywood ruins every game they touch.....with maybe an exception to Silent Hill which was okish.

Was Chris Redfield in the movies? How did I miss that?? Probably because they fail to mention anyone's name..even the "main character's"...

oops my mistake...it was Carlos Olivea.....spelt that wrong i know...still it had Wesker in it and he looked nowt like Wesker......and all this stupid using Crimson head zombie to capture the Alice project...i'm sorry but there is no way you could manipulate crimson heads....did the producer ever play the games and see what they were like...they were mad beyond mad.

I think they should never have fired Romero as director.....check this out....it might have been more better if this was chosen as the script...it had Chris and Jill to star for crying out loud.

In 1999, Sony and Capcom greenlit a Resident Evil film with George A. Romero signed on as the film's director and screenplay writer. Romero's association with Capcom, the Resident Evil video game series creators, had extended from 1998 when Romero directed an ad campaign for Biohazard 2 (Resident Evil 2) in Japan. Romero stated in an official appearance in Universal Studio's Talk City chatroom that he had his secretary play the entire game through and record the gameplay so he could study it as a resource. Romero's screenplay revolved around the plot of the Arklay incident and included characters from the Resident Evil video games. Jill Valentine and Chris Redfield were the lead characters, involved in a romantic relationship. Barry Burton, Rebecca Chambers, Ada Wong and Albert Wesker were to also appear. The ending to the film would have been similar to that of the Resident Evil video game. However, Romero's script was disapproved of and production was placed into development hell.

I'd like Romero's better. But Ada in the Arklay incident? Why can't they just make the game into movie form? Seriously...you have everything right in front of you...just film it! My gosh in heaven...

Ture Ada is a complete miscast there....just like the movies using Nemesis in number 2 when he full well didn't appear until the third installment....and where was William Birkin...nowhere to be seen...the movies don't even capitalise on Wesker being one of the badest bad guys ever.....so much is wrong with those films it ain't even funny...if i was a multi millionaire i'd make the movies....exactly like the game...i just don't understand where Capcom was coming from by allowing and giving the go ahead for Andersons crap version....it's nothing like the games.